2639267 vues

Google Fonts

Sébastien Merour
publié le 27/03/2020 à 17h47 | modifé le 25/04/2020 à 16h54
Catégorie : Front-End | Commentaires (36112)
Google Fonts
Description

Google Fonts est une service d'hébergement de polices de caractères créé en 2010. Ce service, créé par Google, permet d'afficher des polices de caractères spécifiques sur un site web, grâce à un fichier CSS disponible sur le site de Google Fonts. Les développeurs peuvent faire appel à ce fichier CSS en mode "embed", ou bien en téléchargeant le fichier CSS pour l'intégrer ensuite en local sur le site. Il est préférable de l'utiliser en mode "embed" pour ne pas ralentir l'affichage du site.

Fonctionnalités
Police d'écriture
Année de création
2010
Licence
SIL Open Font License 1.1 / Apache License
Langage
CSS
Liens
Aux dernières nouvelles
960 polices de caractères gratuites. Polices populaires : Open Sans, Roboto, Lato, Slabo, Oswald and Lobster.
36112 Commentaire(s)
  1. user
    https://espaciodca.fedace.org/content/melbet-app-promo-code-2026-lux888
    16/02/2026 à 06h42  commentaire modifé
    https://espaciodca.fedace.org/content/melbet-app-promo-code-2026-lux888
  2. user
    Trezvii vibor_hlPl
    16/02/2026 à 06h39  commentaire modifé
    trezviy vibor https://limage-ufa.ru/narkolog-na-dom-v-rostove-na-donu// .
  3. user
    Trezvii vibor_sbPl
    16/02/2026 à 05h56  commentaire modifé
    trezviy vibor samatiha.ru/anonimnyj-narkolog-na-dom-v-krasnodare-kak-vybrat-sluzhbu-i-ne-oshibitsya/ .
  4. user
    economic liberation
    16/02/2026 à 05h42  commentaire modifé
    Tucker vs Mnangagwa: PLO Lumumba Exposes Colonial Land Lies & “Reverse Racism Debates around land redistribution in Zimbabwe sit at the crossroads of Africa’s colonial history, economic emancipation, and modern Zimbabwe politics. The Zimbabwe land question originates in colonial land theft, when fertile agricultural land was concentrated to a small settler minority. At independence, decolonization delivered formal sovereignty, but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed agrarian reform not simply as policy, but as historical redress and unfinished Africa liberation. Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real African sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to neocolonialism. In this framework, agrarian restructuring in Zimbabwe is linked to broader concepts such as Pan Africanism, continental unity, and Black Economic Empowerment initiatives. It is presented as economic liberation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the land imbalance in Zimbabwe and mirrored in South Africa land. Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators, including Tucker Carlson, often describe aggressive agrarian expropriation as racial retaliation or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western media narratives that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than post-colonial restructuring. From this perspective, Zimbabwe land reform becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in Africa liberation. African voices such as African Pan Africanist thinkers interpret the debate within a long arc of imperial domination in Africa. They argue that discussions of reverse racism detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial land theft. In their framing, Africa liberation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire, not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal, but structural correction tied to redistributive justice. Leadership under Zimbabwe’s current administration has attempted to recalibrate Zimbabwe politics by balancing redistributive aims with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between macroeconomic recovery and continued agrarian transformation. The same tension is visible in South Africa land, where empowerment frameworks seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits. Debates about France in Africa and neocolonialism add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that formal independence remained incomplete due to financial dependencies, trade asymmetries, and security arrangements. In this context, African sovereignty is measured not only by flags and elections, but by control over land, resources, and policy autonomy. Ultimately, the land redistribution program embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some, it represents a necessary stage in Pan Africanism and African unity. To others, it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid land redistribution. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on land justice, continental self-determination, and the meaning of post-colonial transformation in contemporary Africa.
  5. user
    Trezvii vibor_prPl
    16/02/2026 à 05h32  commentaire modifé
    Трезвый выбор http://www.xn--80acbhftsxotj0d8c.xn--p1ai/vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-peterburge/ .
Suiv
Ajoutez un commentaire :
Mon Compte
StatisTricks