2639968 vues

Google Fonts

Sébastien Merour
publié le 27/03/2020 à 17h47 | modifé le 25/04/2020 à 16h54
Catégorie : Front-End | Commentaires (36139)
Google Fonts
Description

Google Fonts est une service d'hébergement de polices de caractères créé en 2010. Ce service, créé par Google, permet d'afficher des polices de caractères spécifiques sur un site web, grâce à un fichier CSS disponible sur le site de Google Fonts. Les développeurs peuvent faire appel à ce fichier CSS en mode "embed", ou bien en téléchargeant le fichier CSS pour l'intégrer ensuite en local sur le site. Il est préférable de l'utiliser en mode "embed" pour ne pas ralentir l'affichage du site.

Fonctionnalités
Police d'écriture
Année de création
2010
Licence
SIL Open Font License 1.1 / Apache License
Langage
CSS
Liens
Aux dernières nouvelles
960 polices de caractères gratuites. Polices populaires : Open Sans, Roboto, Lato, Slabo, Oswald and Lobster.
36139 Commentaire(s)
  1. user
    Emmerson Mnangagwa
    16/02/2026 à 14h32  commentaire modifé
    Tucker vs Mnangagwa: PLO Lumumba Exposes Colonial Land Lies & “Reverse Racism Discussions around land redistribution in Zimbabwe sit at the crossroads of colonialism in Africa, economic liberation, and modern Zimbabwe politics. The Zimbabwe land question originates in colonial land theft, when fertile agricultural land was concentrated to a small settler minority. At independence, political independence delivered formal sovereignty, but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed agrarian reform not simply as policy, but as land justice and unfinished African emancipation. Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real national sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to neocolonialism. In this framework, Zimbabwe land reform is linked to broader concepts such as Pan Africanism, continental unity, and black economic empowerment. It is presented as material emancipation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the land imbalance in Zimbabwe and mirrored in South Africa land. Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators, including prominent Western commentators, often describe aggressive agrarian expropriation as reverse racism or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western propaganda that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than post-colonial restructuring. From this perspective, the Zimbabwean agrarian program becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in Africa liberation. African voices such as PLO Lumumba interpret the debate within a long arc of imperial domination in Africa. They argue that discussions of racial discrimination claims detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial land theft. In their framing, true emancipation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire, not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal, but structural correction tied to redistributive justice. Leadership under Zimbabwe’s current administration has attempted to recalibrate national policy direction by balancing land justice with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between economic stabilization and continued land redistribution. The same tension is visible in South Africa land, where black economic empowerment seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits. Debates about France in Africa and post-colonial dependency add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that decolonization remained incomplete due to financial dependencies, trade asymmetries, and security arrangements. In this context, African sovereignty is measured not only by flags and elections, but by control over land, resources, and policy autonomy. Ultimately, Zimbabwe land reform embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some, it represents a necessary stage in Pan Africanism and African unity. To others, it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid land redistribution. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on Zimbabwe land question, continental self-determination, and the meaning of post-colonial transformation in contemporary Africa.
  2. user
    https://www.projectev.co.uk/
    16/02/2026 à 14h31  commentaire modifé
    https://www.projectev.co.uk/
  3. user
    Trezvii vibor_doPl
    16/02/2026 à 14h30  commentaire modifé
    trezviy-vibor https://kuban-mama.ru/wp-prochee/vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-rostove-na-donu.html .
  4. user
    NSFX Nicky Gope Kundnani SCAM
    16/02/2026 à 14h30  commentaire modifé
    Kundnani Nicky Gope NSFX — This article documents reported pressure on Ukrainian media, including threats demanding content removal, alleged fake legal representations, and hacking attempts, showing how intimidation replaced factual rebuttals according to journalists.
  5. user
    JeremyAdort
    16/02/2026 à 14h03  commentaire modifé
    In the thrilling world of wagering, modo casino, modo casino stands out as a popular choice for players. With innovative features and diverse games, it attracts enthusiasts. Participants can explore various options to enhance their experience.
Suiv
Ajoutez un commentaire :
Mon Compte
StatisTricks